WHEN THE SYSTEM FAILS MOTHERS: MY JOURNEY THROUGH THE COURTS (DIVORCE AND CHILD SUPPORT)

 

According to the law, both parents share a legal responsibility to financially support their children. This includes providing for essential needs such as food, clothing, housing, education, and medical care. This obligation applies to all children—whether minors or adults—so long as they remain financially dependent on their parents. Both biological parents are legally required to contribute to child support.

Those familiar with my situation know that I have faced ongoing challenges in getting my ex-husband to fulfil this responsibility, particularly for our two children who are still in school. He has outright refused to pay child support. This issue is not only about meeting our children’s financial needs but also about honouring the parental obligations outlined in our divorce settlement.

It’s been three years since our separation and over a year since the divorce was finalized, yet I’m still fighting for what should be a basic right for my children. The courts are failing them by not enforcing their legal entitlement to support from both parents. At times, it feels as though child support laws only benefit a select few—I don’t know what criteria are used, but they certainly don’t seem to apply equally to everyone.

There are moments when I wish I could be that bitter, vindictive mother who denies him access to our son, because he portrays himself as a responsible father when he’s not. Every time he sees our son, he makes sure the world knows by posting it all over social media.

At our first court appearance, he claimed he pays for the children’s school fees and provides for them financially. What made it worse was that, despite the evidence I submitted showing I am the sole provider, the court still asked him to produce supporting documents. I remember crying that day because I felt the system was failing me. To make matters worse, the judge called me “sinister” simply because I requested that if the case was going to be postponed for him to provide proof, then he should at least support his children in the meantime. How could asking him to step up and care for his kids—something he publicly claims to do—be seen as me being evil?

I was deeply hurt, especially because this came from a woman—the presiding judge. What made it worse was what happened outside the courtroom. My ex-husband told my attorney that I was taking him to court out of bitterness and anger because he has moved on and has a new partner. He went further, claiming that he had given me “financial freedom” by not claiming his 50% share of my pension and by leaving me and the children in the house.

He even told my attorney that I am an evil person and I’m even fighting with our eldest daughter. Ironically, the same daughter he mentioned was with me in court that day and confronted him after seeing me in tears following the proceedings. That day, he also stated that he would not contribute toward buying our son’s school uniform for his new school because he had already paid for the registration. For context, I had refused to pay the registration fee when he asked me to contribute 50%, reminding him of the audacity of such a request when he has never helped with our son’s school needs—excursions, uniforms, pocket money, extra-mural activities—and doesn’t even know that his son needs regular haircuts not even his clothing needs.

I told him plainly that I did not have the money, and if it meant our son had to stay home because I couldn’t pay for registration, then so be it.

He eventually paid the registration fee, but I paid the price for it—he made it very clear that he would not buy our son’s uniform or stationery. I accepted the situation and bought the stationery and part of the uniform myself. Later, I called my attorney to report that my ex-husband and his legal team were violating my son’s right to be supported by both parents as per our settlement agreement. I had to explain it to them using legal terminology, in a language they could understand, to get him to assist.

That same day, my ex-husband called and asked what else our son still needed, but with the audacity to tell me to only list the “important” items because he didn’t have money. I reminded him that every responsible parent knows their children return to school in January and plans ahead financially to cover all school requirements. My daughter sent him a short list of about six remaining items. His response? He asked what I had already bought because he thought the list was “too long.” I didn’t argue—I simply sent him the receipts showing everything I had purchased and the amount I spent. That seemed to silence him.

The classic part came during the school’s commencement ceremony. He asked our son to send me all the groceries he needed and asked me to forward the list to him so he could buy them, since month-end was approaching and we needed to replenish what had run out from the groceries I bought in January. He insisted that I send the list, but when I did, his response was that he didn’t have money and that I should buy what I could, and he would cover the rest. Needless to say, that never happened, and I didn’t even bother to send him the list of what I had bought.

At the second court appearance, he showed up without an attorney, claiming he could no longer afford legal representation and asking the court for time to find another lawyer. This was surprising because he was supposed to present supporting documents to back up his bold claim that he provides for our children—yet suddenly, he couldn’t afford an attorney.

That day he didn’t come alone; he arrived with an entourage—his sister and her husband. It was disappointing to see his sister, a woman and a mother herself, standing by him in support of his refusal to pay child support or provide for his children. Personally, I was raised to believe that my siblings’ children are my children, and I would never allow anything to jeopardize their well-being. Clearly, we were raised differently. To her, these children seem to be “mine,” and she feels no responsibility toward them, even if supporting her brother means condoning something morally wrong.

But honestly, what should I expect from someone who openly embraced my daughter’s perpetrator, sending a loud and clear message that my daughter didn’t matter as a victim—that the perpetrator was more important to her?

But you know what? I serve a mighty God. During recess, just as I was about to approach the prosecutor to ask what would happen in the interim, one of the court interpreters came up to me, complimented my outfit, and asked which case was mine. I explained, and she said, “Yoh, chomi, that guy who suddenly can’t afford a lawyer when he’s supposed to submit supporting documents?” I replied, “The very same guy, chomi.”

She said, “Say no more. I’ll take you to someone who assesses cases—tell him your story, and he’ll help you.” She literally took me by the hand to this guy’s office. When we got there, my attorney and I explained everything. The gentleman then said, with my permission, he would transfer my case back to the maintenance court because, in criminal court, my ex-husband has rights—and he knows them well. He’s playing games to drag this out until I get tired and abandon the case.

Now, I know you might ask why my case was in criminal court. It’s because our divorce settlement clearly outlined his responsibilities—financial and otherwise—and how he should provide for our children until they are financially independent. When he failed to do so, he was in contempt of court, which triggered Section 31 of the Children’s Act, and that’s why the matter was referred to criminal court.

At our third court appearance, he arrived with a new attorney who was loud but made little sense. The judge ultimately decided to transfer the matter back to the maintenance court based on the recommendation made by the other gentleman I met during the previous hearing. His attorney then insisted that he needed to be served again since the case was no longer in criminal court. I’m sure they assumed this would discourage me and make me abandon the process—but instead, I went straight back to the maintenance court, lodged a new application, and had him served that very same day.

At our fourth appearance, he showed up with yet another new attorney, who claimed to have no background on the case and requested more time to get up to speed. The matter was postponed yet again. My attorney then asked that, in the interim, he make an offer for how much child support he could pay. His response? He told me to draft a spreadsheet detailing all the costs of our children’s daily needs. Imagine—a father needing to be told how much his own children require for their upkeep! It was beyond disappointing that he has no clue of child maintenance costs, though not surprising.

Around June, our son was injured during hockey practice. The school tried to reach me, and when they couldn’t, they called him. He did the right thing by taking our son to the doctor and paying cash since the doctor didn’t accept medical aid. They advised him to claim the amount back from the medical aid. When he gave me the invoice, he told me to submit the claim and, once reimbursed, pay him back. Heee banna! What kind of fool does this man think I am?

Nagana fela—I’m fighting tooth and nail just to get him to support his own children, and then he suggests that I should claim the medical refund and pay him back? Kana ke a gafa nna neh! Honestly, I thought he was joking until our son’s birthday. I called to speak to our son and wish him a happy birthday because I knew he was with him as he was taking him for a follow-up appointment. Before letting me talk to him, he asked—and I quote—“Did you manage to claim that money? Did they pay it back already?” I said no, and he replied, “Eish, then it means I have to pay cash again.”

Kgante ke ngwana wa mang bathong? Who is supposed to pay for his son’s medical bills—Ntate wa ko next door? Mxm wa ntlholla. Let me make this clear: even if the refund had been paid into my account at that time, I would never have given him the money back. I might be gullible sometimes, but I’m not stupid—ke sure ka eo.

And just when I thought this couldn’t get worse, on June 25th, I received a text from him: “Morning, can you please send my money back. Both consultation refunds must be paid now.” Yoh! Metlholo ga e fele tlhe! This man is unbelievable—now claiming I have two invoices for both consultations when he only gave me one. For what? R600? I told him to come collect the invoice and claim the money himself.

The nerve, guys! Yoh! That week he had hosted an intimate Mother’s Day luncheon at his house for all his baby mamas, pampering them—and now he has the audacity to ask me to pay him back for his own son’s medical consultation. A ke gafe ke sure. Maybe he should ask the baby mamas to chip in and donate for him since he finished the money on them because clearly, wa short-a after spoiling them. Lol…

At the fifth appearance, his attorney claimed he had received the case bundles late from my attorney and hadn’t had time to review them, requesting yet more time. The games they are playing are exhausting. However, the maintenance officer, firmly stated that at the next appearance, the case should be concluded. He made it clear that no further delays would be allowed and warned that if they come unprepared, he will issue an order in my favour and grant my request. You can imagine how hopeful I was for when we return for the next hearing for what should have been the final appearance.

In the meantime, the children remain without maintenance nor an interim solution.

Before I left the courtroom, the maintenance officer asked if he owed me money. I confirmed that he did—and quite a lot—because he has failed to support the children throughout our separation and divorce. The officer then advised me and my attorney to file an urgent application for a Warrant of Execution (Section 27), which allows for the seizure and sale of my ex-husband’s movable or immovable property to recover the outstanding amount. He was very clear that this should be done before the next court hearing.

Things may be moving slowly, but I truly believe they are unfolding according to God’s plan and purpose for my life—because there is progress.

At the fifth appearance, my character was completely assassinated. When the magistrate asked his attorney whether my ex-husband could take our son out of boarding school and give me the money to support him, the attorney boldly claimed that he couldn’t because, as instructed, the home environment is “toxic” and that I am “toxic.”

Immediately after that, everything shifted—the magistrate turned against me, saying I shouldn’t waste the court’s time and that nobody forced me to sign the divorce settlement. He even suggested that my ex-husband take my son to live with him. My ex-husband then lied to the court, claiming he takes our son every second weekend and provides for him, when in reality, all he does is pay boarding fees. He also claimed he gives our son R400 pocket money monthly, which is completely false—there’s a Good Samaritan who actually sends our son money monthly, and I monitor my son’s account, so I know the truth.

The magistrate then asked why I wanted maintenance when my son lives at school and gets food there. I explained that there’s more to life than food at boarding school—he needs haircuts, snacks, clothes, entertainment, transport money for school excursions, for trips home, and other essentials. Meanwhile, we discovered that my ex-husband has multiple bank accounts. While his attorney was pleading poverty, in the middle of all the paperwork and confusion, one of his statements quietly revealed something unexpected—a substantial balance sitting in another account, almost like a hidden truth waiting to surface. Despite all of this, I was the one who was ruthlessly questioned, confronted, and treated as though I am irresponsible—when in reality, I am the parent showing up, providing, and fighting for my children every single day.

Still, the court postponed the matter yet again. Honestly, this time I wanted to give up. After that session, I told my attorney I had never been humiliated like that in my life. I said I’d drop the case and struggle with my children as I have been, trusting that God will provide. My attorney convinced me to keep going because now that the matter is going to trial, where both sides must present supporting documents of all expenses for the children. I was sceptical, but eventually, I decided—I’ll fight until the end. 

The sixth appearance, the matter could not proceed as my ex-husband failed to appear, with his absence reportedly due to illness. Consequently, the case was postponed yet again.

By this stage, I had grown increasingly concerned about how my case had been managed from the outset. The matter was postponed yet again, I believed this was now his tactic to exhaust me and force me to abandon the case.

At the next appearance now the seventh one, I informed the prosecutor that my ex-husband had undisclosed bank accounts—something I discovered by chance when he gave our son a bank card linked to those accounts. In previous court sessions, he claimed to send our son R400 in pocket money each month, which is untrue. I intended to print the bank statements to prove this; however, the account was linked to his primary profile, which includes multiple accounts.

What shocked me during this session was the statement made by his attorney: he argued that, according to the settlement agreement, my ex-husband was only responsible for paying boarding fees and that he was complying with that obligation.

• I had to personally point out to both the prosecutor and his attorney that the settlement agreement clearly outlines additional maintenance responsibilities, which he has consistently failed to meet.
• I was deeply disappointed to realise that this information—clearly contained in my file—had not been reviewed or acknowledged by the prosecutor. It made me feel as though my case was not being taken seriously.
• After I revealed the existence of the undisclosed bank accounts, the prosecutor finally stated that they would subpoena my ex-husband so the additional accounts and other financial matters could be properly investigated.

We returned to court on Monday, 06 October 2025, as the matter had been postponed to allow for a subpoena to be served and for the investigation report to be finalized following the previous appearance on 21 August 2025. However, upon arrival, the prosecutor informed us that he was uncertain whether the investigation had been completed. He explained that the maintenance investigation officer was on leave until Friday, 10 October 2025, and that no one in the office had access to the officer’s computer or files, making it impossible to verify the status of the investigation. This was yet another frustrating setback, particularly as we had been assured that the investigation report would be available for the 06 October 2025 appearance. Then, on the morning of 08 October 2025, I received an official notification stating: “Maintenance Case Enquiry Subpoena.” This confirmed that the subpoena was only served on 08 October 2025—two days after our scheduled court date—a delay that could have been avoided had the process been handled more diligently. The court hearing was subsequently postponed to 10 November 2025. I was deeply disappointed that the steps leading to this postponement were only completed on 08 October 2025. This delay directly and negatively affected my children, whose right to financial support continued to be compromised, leaving the entire responsibility on me as their sole provider.

Investigation Report and Procedural Issues

The investigation report expected from the maintenance investigation officer was not available as promised. When we followed up on the morning of the court sitting, he informed us that he had only requested the necessary bank information on Thursday, 06 November 2025—significantly later than anticipated.

Furthermore, when I applied for a Section 26 on 29 November 2025, the maintenance investigating officer stated that his system was down and he could not retrieve the reports. He assured me that he would initiate the process that same day (29 November 2025), yet there has been no indication of any meaningful progress since then when we went for another sitting on the 10^th of November 2025.

Concerns About the Presiding Magistrate

During the proceedings on 10 November 2025, the magistrate repeatedly stated that “this is not her court,” explaining that she is from the Children’s Court and was only standing in for another magistrate. This raises a critical concern: why was she presiding over my matter if she was not authorized to make decisions?

Section 26 and Interim Maintenance Issues

My attorney informed the magistrate that I had attempted to apply for a Section 26 but was turned away on the basis that my ex-husband “cannot be garnished as he is unemployed. The magistrate responded that this was an administrative issue, not a matter for the court. When my attorney requested that she issue a ruling for interim maintenance, she stated that she could not because an existing order was already in place. (This is perplexing, as we were in court precisely because the existing order is not being followed or enforced). My attorney clarified that the existing order is not being complied with, yet the magistrate insisted that the matter must be addressed through a formal complaint to the Senior Magistrate, rather than her issuing any immediate relief.

Systemic Failure and Impact on My Children

The system is failing not only my minor son but also my other children by repeatedly compromising their fundamental right to financial support from both parents. It is deeply disheartening that this ongoing violation persists—not only because the other parent refuses to take responsibility, but also because the system has failed to take effective and timely action to safeguard my children’s rights. What I hoped would be a straightforward process to secure their rights has instead become a journey marked by confusion, frustration, and disappointment. Rather than receiving clarity or support, I have felt unheard and sidelined. My children depend on me to fight for their rights, yet the system continues to fail them. All I seek is fairness, accountability, and a process that genuinely prioritizes the best interests of the children.

Personal and Financial Impact

My greatest frustration, stemming from the lack of consideration in how my matter was being handled, is the repeated burden of having to take leave—often unpaid—for every court appearance. Each postponement imposed a financial strain, particularly on days when I am forced to take unpaid leave. Beyond the financial impact, my work performance and responsibilities have also suffered, as I was required to take leave almost every month due to the continued delays in this case. Unfortunately, this is the sad reality many women face when fighting to uphold their children’s rights.

Broken Promises and Manipulative Behaviour

During our last court appearance in 2025, his attorney assured the magistrate that my ex-husband would assist with our son’s school requirements. This turned out to be completely false. Despite my attorney’s follow-up emails and unanswered phone calls, there was no response. My attorney then advised me to email my ex-husband directly with the list of requirements to put him on the spot. Once again, he ignored the message—only contacting me two days before our son was due to return to school in January 2026, asking for “urgent stationery requirements.”

By that time, I had already purchased everything—stationery, uniform top-ups, and other essentials—because I could not risk waiting indefinitely for his response. When he called the day before schools reopened i.e. on 13.01.2026 with the same question, I asked him, “Do you think I would really sit and wait for you, not knowing if you would respond?” I was furious because it was clear he was playing games, especially since the only reason he reached out was because we were due in court on 19 January 2026.

He then offered to buy snacks for school. I told him to do whatever he wanted, though we didn’t believe he would follow through—he never does. We even went shopping ourselves, only to see him buying snacks at the store. What is most upsetting is that every time he does something for our son, he takes pictures and posts them on Facebook to create the illusion of being a responsible father. This pattern always coincides with upcoming court dates.

Similarly, when schools closed in 2025, my son misplaced his school shirts and was left with only one, which I only discovered at the start of the 2026 school term. We asked him to purchase two replacements to cover the first few days of school. Instead of simply assisting, he chose to make a public post on Facebook, presenting himself as a devoted father. This he does always portraying me as a bitter ex-wife attempting to undermine him. These actions are manipulative and misleading, intended to protect his image rather than genuinely support his children. 

On 19 January 2026, I walked into court with a simple goal: to collect financial reports my attorney needed for my case. I thought I was prepared for anything, but the numbers we found in those reports left us stunned. It’s unbelievable how some men can live lavish, comfortable lives while their own children struggle to get the basics they deserve. That reality hit me harder than any courtroom battle ever could.

Then came the next court date: 19 February 2026.

As usual, I arrived early, signed the register, and waited. But something felt off—our case wasn’t on the court roll and for the first time since the court journey started, my ex‑husband showed up unusually early—before me. It happens from time to time, and usually they add the case manually before we go inside. I tried to remain calm, hopeful even.

But when we finally stood before the magistrate, he said words I will never forget:

“The case has been dismissed.”

Just like that. No hearing, no warning, no chance to speak. And just like that, I was told to start over from the very beginning.

Shockingly, I didn’t cry. I didn’t break. I’ve seen enough from this court to know disappointment all too well. But I did feel something deep inside me crack a little—not because of the dismissal itself, but because this is exactly how so many women lose hope. This is how mothers get exhausted, defeated, and eventually give up. And in South Africa’s maintenance courts, this story is far too common.

But what followed next was even more unbelievable.

The prosecutor calmly explained that he had advised the magistrate to strike the matter off the roll, not dismiss it. There’s a big difference. Yet the magistrate insisted on dismissal. And here’s the twist: this was the same magistrate I had previously requested to be recused from my case.

The plot thickened even more when my attorney later told me that before the court session, my ex-husband approached him saying he’d received a message that the case was “already closed.” My attorney didn’t think much of it at the time because I hadn’t mentioned anything, but in hindsight, that comment raised far too many questions. The biggest question and key concern we all had was this: why was he the one who received the communication/message, and not me—the actual complainant?

Something wasn’t and isn’t right.

My attorney looked at the bigger picture and advised me not to start over. Instead, we are taking the matter to the High Court. Because dismissing a child support case—without the mother withdrawing it—is unheard of. It’s irregular, unjust, and deeply suspicious.

And I refuse to let this go.

Because this isn’t just about me.
It’s about every mother who has ever walked into a courtroom seeking justice for her child… and walked out feeling invisible.

This is not the end of my fight.
This is the beginning of a bigger one. 

Our justice system continues to fail women and children in maintenance courts through inefficient, underfunded, and patriarchal processes. These systemic flaws enable fathers to default on payments without consequence, while enforcement remains weak and hearings are repeatedly delayed. Gender bias persists, with courts prioritizing fathers’ hardship claims over mothers’ urgent needs. Barriers such as inaccessible procedures further entrench inequality, leaving mothers economically vulnerable and children deprived of essential support—despite laws that mandate shared parental responsibility. This is not just a failure of process; it is a failure of justice.

Now, I want to address something we often shy away from discussing fathers who vanish—those who willingly choose not to pay child support and fail to care for their children emotionally, physically, and financially. Child support alone isn’t enough. In my view, they should face charges beyond that—neglect and emotional abuse—because simply being ordered to pay a monthly amount, which is often inadequate, does not reflect the harm caused.

Men get away with far too much, and sadly, society enables it. We nurture and normalize these behaviours. When men are absent from their children’s lives, society responds with silence—maybe a little gossip here and there—but nothing meaningful. They walk away with nothing more than a court case that often drags on without judgment because women grow tired of being humiliated by the system. Even when child support is ordered, they barely pay yet still have the audacity to parade themselves as good fathers—and worse, they are sometimes praised for being deadbeat dads.

We need to understand that raising a child goes far beyond providing food and shelter. For women raising children alone, the challenges are immense—the mental load that no one talks about, the constant pressure to stay strong while carrying everything alone, the weight that gets dumped on a mother while everyone expects her to stay strong and never fall apart. There are sleepless nights, homework, bills, school fees, doctor visits, school meetings, sports injuries, playdates—the list is endless.

In the absence of a father, a mother must be everything: provider, nurturer, disciplinarian, protector, counsellor, doctor, chauffeur, comforter etc. Some even endure the heartbreak of their children asking where their father is—and being blamed for his absence.

Parenting isn’t just a title; it’s a lifelong commitment. If you can’t uphold that commitment, you shouldn’t expect to walk away untouched while the other parent picks up the broken pieces you left behind.

I once read something that resonated deeply: “If a man creates a life and then chooses not to be present in that child’s life, it is an abandonment of that child in every sense of the word. He should be held legally and emotionally accountable the same way a mother would be.”

If a mother were to walk away from her children, society would tear her apart. She’d be labelled unfit, punished for being absent, shamed publicly, and dragged through the mud—and rightfully so, because every child deserves stability, love, and support from both parents. Every child deserves to be protected and raised by both parents, at all costs.

Women are constantly in survival mode, and when they speak out, they’re labelled as bitter, evil, or revengeful. But is it wrong for women to ask for peaceful co-parenting and accountability from fathers? It’s only fair—if you helped bring a child into this world, you should help raise them.

It’s clear that this man is on a mission to hurt me by refusing to provide for his children and playing endless games. But honestly, I don’t care—it doesn’t affect me. Maybe I’m just not in touch with my feelings. It’s almost laughable because he used to call me mmeke—and truth is, I don’t get shaken by petty issues. What he’s doing now, trying to manipulate the system, is petty, and I have all the time and patience in the world for it.

This is the same man who cried when his niece went to varsity because he couldn’t afford groceries or pocket money for her. He can cry for not being able to support his niece, yet his own children are neglected. The same man who bragged about how his father provided for him and his sister so they lacked nothing—yet today, he can’t do the same for his own kids. The fact is he lies so much that his lies sounds like the truth to him, he’s going around saying he’s given me financial freedom by not claiming my pension funds and not demanding that we sell our house. That has nothing to do with his financial responsibilities toward his children. You can call me bitter if you want, I genuinely don’t care. These are the facts and it won’t change the fact that everything I’m saying is true!

Why Should a Father Need to Be Forced to Care?

There’s something that still baffles me, no matter how many times I replay it in my mind. People keep bringing up things that have absolutely nothing to do with his financial responsibilities toward his children, as if those excuses somehow cancel out what he should naturally be doing. And honestly, I’m tired of pretending it makes sense. It doesn’t.

I keep asking myself: “How does a grown man need to be pushed, reminded, or even legally forced to provide for his own children?” These are his kids—flesh of his flesh, carrying his name, his features, his future. Yet somehow, the idea of showing up for them—financially, emotionally, consistently—has become something he sees as a burden and optional.

He keeps telling everyone—again and again—how he “pays boarding fees” for our son, and somehow that alone convinces him, and the people he repeats it to who are so quick to judge me, that he’s fulfilling his responsibilities. As if doing one thing cancels out everything else. As if parenting is a single line item on a list that can be ticked off and forgotten or a single box you tick once and never revisit.

And every time I hear this, I’m left stunned—truly shocked that he believes that’s enough. To me, that’s the bare minimum. It’s certainly not something to boast about, and definitely not a badge of honor.

What hurts the most isn’t even the lack of support—it’s the lack of understanding, the lack of willingness to do more than the minimum. It’s the realization that responsibility has to be negotiated, argued, justified… when it should come naturally.

I’m still waiting for it all to make sense.
But maybe it never will.

Unfortunately for him, he’s not hurting me—he’s hurting his own children. They are the ones paying the price for his selfishness. He’s so focused on trying to hurt me that he doesn’t see he’s destroying and causing lasting emotional damage and harm to his own children. And that is truly heartbreaking, it is beyond sad.

My journey continues and I strive to move towards a happier and more fulfilling life🥂💃🏽🥰 I’m Just A Small Girl With A Big God🙏🏽💕 Mercy Rewrote My Life🙏🏽💕 Mercy Said No🙏🏽💕 Grace Has Located Me🙏🏽💕 I Am An Overcomer🙏🏾💕A Very Beautiful Story❤️ Live in the moment, Laugh harder, Love💖 deeply & Celebrate more💕🎉🥂💃🏽🥰

 

But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever - 1 Timothy 5:8🙏🏽🙏🏽

Love & Light 

Dipsy💚